Yay, Mclaren Circus is in Town?
Mclaren Circus, the biggest in South Africa, landed in Knysna High School’s field like a wedge between our community. On one side, there are those wishing to see wonder sparkle in their children’s eyes (as it happened for them when they were a child) whilst the other, mostly white people, are screaming, “poor animals”.
Mclaren Circus is no stranger to controversy, maybe more so for conflicts with public conscience than for ‘direct’ mistreatment of its animals. “Mistreatment” and “animal cruelty” have, over time, shifting definitions. In the past, fear would train animals whereas nowadays circuses have realised that positive re-enforcement works best. In the past, animals were malnourished and kept in very small cages whereas nowadays they’re more likely to get exercise between travelling (lions laze about 20hrs per day in the wild) and, in the case of McLarens, look very healthy. And wild animals were almost like freak shows but in our modern times they are hand-raised i.e. they aren’t wild.
My position was simple… until this week when many started asking my opinion and i was forced to reassess my views so that i could explain them. It left me feeling very uncomfortable.
I don’t believe animals should be caged. I can live with aquariums for fishy education and rescue centres (e.g. Jukani) but can’t handle zoos or dolphinariums (after watching the documentary ‘Blackfish 2 weeks ago, i was devastated, feeling depressed for days). And dogfighting is a no brainer!
But am i a hypocrite? The empathy one feels towards animals is partly (or majorly) a result of one’s upbringing and culture – cows, monkeys, rats and dogs are rarely all loved or revered within one area. Particularly, so-called Western civilization, has damaged the balance of nature by it’s penchant for pets which are as much accessories and by-products of loneliness to some as they are family friends and guardians to others. This excessive and unnatural pet population damages the world through altering bird migrations, demanding more pet food which, in turn, means less farms for human consumption and an exaggeration of GM products etc.
How many of you in South Africa who yell for animal rights love to tuck into a good steak or piece of Kentucky Fried Chicken even though the industry is a torture mill. On average, we each eat 30kg of chicken, 9kg of egg and 24kg of beef annually. *
If you say you’re a vegetarian for moral reasons then i have to use that word ‘hypocrite’ again because that’s more to make you feel good than to help animals. After all, the dairy and poultry you consume is irrevocably linked to the meat industry. That poor cow that may be forced into a 4-year pregnancy for the sake of your cereal or milkshake might only escape it’s painful confinement after it’s legs buckle, forcing it into it’s new career as a hamburger patty. According to SAPA (South African Poultry Association) figures, “in 2012 the poultry industry supplied 1.88 billion tons of poultry meat and 464 051 tons of hen eggs and egg product, totaling a staggering 2.35 billion tons.” If you want the ‘moral high ground’, become a vegan.
If South Africa’s millions of cattle and chickens had a say…what would they say?
The law of nature is that, cruel or not, the most vicious/successful animal wins. We are that animal. Do we want to stop the meat industry and have hundreds of thousands in South Africa go unemployed? Do you believe that animal trainers can love the animals they train? Do you teach your dog tricks and then show her off to your friends? Do you want animal trainers to lose their jobs?
And let’s not forget the joy that circuses such as McLaren have given to tens of thousands of people. Should that come into the equation? Do they give more than they take?
As the Hermanus Times said, “The lions were one of the most memorable scenes, their roars echoed fear and excitement through the crowd as the glorious beasts snarled but still preformed their acts to perfection. Every act catered to different people, the clowns obviously stole the show with their humour and tricks, but I can honestly say there was not one show that I thought bland. The human chandelier was an act that left my mouth gaping, as a small Chinese lady managed to use her agile body to balance an array of 100 lit candles. All the animals and the performers were extraordinary and next year I will make sure we are seated in the front row again to view the circus from the best vantage point. It was entertaining 90minutes of pure enjoyment and surprises!”
It’s been a circuitous route to making my point which is more questioning. Where do you stand? Do you yell for animal rights when it’s easy or do you do it all the time?
Regards animal circuses, i’ve set up a poll to get your opinion. You can’t be tracked so no need to impress any lobby group. Just be honest so that we know what people really think rather than what others make them feel they have to say.
I can’t be your conscience but i can be mine. I’m going to still say “NO” to animals in cages (not even a budgie or a parakeet), refuse to see lions, dolphins and whales perform tricks… and, additionally, not have meat more than twice per week.
As a parallel, do you remember the story of John Rendall and Ace Bourke who bought a lion cub at Harod’s in London. They eventually put him back in the wilderness but, for years, he was their pet, something few moaned about… but when they reunited many years later, and the lion remembered them, everyone sighed with wonder and happiness and few pointed out that he’d been their pet for years i.e. the public’s opinion can be the result of presentation.
* Industry figures vary.
Haaa I agree fully!! Protesters eat meat as I always said that. We need to see a circus with animals just as protesters love to eat their meat all over trying to make names for themselves – close all meat outlets! Let them suffer with no meat to eat!! Steve Irwin’s family continue with his love of the wild – leave the circus alone!! So much to say – I’ll always support the circus with animals – look after yours better and use the circus as an experience of how to take care of animals they are indeed caring and loving Do not be jealous!! You could not own a circus or carried out your dreams and you live with fights with your inner selves Animals for Always in this beautiful circus
Sally – I come from a long line of circus performers – my parents detested the way animals were treated and trained – the methods of training is still used today! The animal’s spirit is broken through physical abuse and torture (baby elephants). Having traveled with some of the biggest animal circuses in the world the methods of training in all the circuses that have animals are the same! When you buy a ticket to go and watch a circus you pay for the torture those animals have gone through and go through on a daily basis.
Hello Colleen, I would be interested to know which circuses you have worked with and which animal trainers you have spent time watching training animals by cruelty and torture! If what you are saying was true, did you or your parents try to stop this!!! Certainly, I am pretty sure in the past, there has been animal trainers/presenters who haven’t always trained and presented animals in a proper manner, just as there are bad pet owners, bad doctors or indeed teachers! However, when we have one bad teacher/doctor/pet owner or whatever, we don’t label all of the same as bad, yet if one person within the circus community does something wrong, all the circus industry is bad! The animal trainers I have watched in several countries on many many occasions have never used any form of cruelty or torture in order to train, in fact quite the opposite and the fact that many of these training sessions are open to the general public daily, also shows they have nothing to hide! You couldn’t hide cruelty daily from the general public.
Protesters eat meat?? Now who’s making generalizations…
Circuses are cruel places for animals and the training even crueller, stop circuses and also stop eating meat, you make a morgue of your fridge and a grave of your stomach, humans are not made to eat meat, no fangs or claws or digestive system that is made for meat, you will all get cancer from all the hormones pumped into the animals to make them fat or get drug resistant diseases as you will be ingesting the antibiotics the animals are given to keep them well and when you need antibiotics you will be resistant to antibiotics which leaves you in big trouble, got it?????
Hormones and antibiotics are my biggest worry. Scary, scary, scary what man will do for profit!
I am dumbstruck after reading this.
The author makes a flawed argument in an apparent attempt to project his own guilt feelings for enjoying animal circuses onto those who are opposed to the use of animals in circuses. The author is aware of the cruelty and unecessary confinement that these animals are subjected to, yet enjoys to watch the show, which creates a conflict within himself. He tries to deal with this conflict by publicly making various inaccurate assumptions, thereby also trying to recruit others with similar conflicts to support his views.
Assuming that all individuals that are opposed to the use of animals in circuses, consume animal products to their heart’s content, and referring to them as “hypocrites” is absurd.
It is disheartening that in this modern day and age, people still support and enjoy this archaic form of “entertainment”, and also impress upon their children the belief that is it acceptable to cage and exploit animals. A few moments of enjoyment does not justify a lifetime of slavery for circus animals.
The author makes numerous points in an attempt to make this practice seem acceptable, referring to “positive reinforcement” training techniques, and unfairly accusing those who don’t share his or her views of various misdemeanors.
However, it remains cruel and unnecessary to remove animals from their families, imprison them for life, and subject them to “training” to perform unnatural acts for human amusement. There is simply no excuse and no place for this practice in 2014.
Mia, unfortunately you didn’t read all of it which maybe proves my point. I said, at the start of this blog, that i was against animals in cages but, out of concern at how many are irrational in coming to the same decision, and ensuring that my own logic was rational, i gave both sides. At the end of it, i said that i still do not believe in animals in cages. I never attended the circus this past weekend and have no intention of doing so in the future unless it were to gain more education (definitely not entertainment).
There’s an interesting comment at the beginning of the video of the amazing story of Christian, the lion raised by humans. It says that Ace and John bought the lion at Harrods, and that people today would be horrified by the idea of a lion cub being sold in a department store. Isn’t that exactly what we who are opposed to wild animals in circuses are saying? Just because it was considered okay in the past, it doesn’t mean that animal circuses are acceptable today. I really don’t think the issue of eating meat or not eating meat is relevant in this debate. We are talking about the circus. We are talking about keeping animals in a totally unnatural environment and training them to do totally unnatural tricks for human entertainment. Why not bring back the gladiators or freak shows – they were also considered ‘acceptable’ by the societies of their time. Are we not better educated and informed, and have our moral values not evolved to a point where we can see that wild animals have no place in circuses?
I absolutely agree that human circuses are better! And that there are people who make rational arguments for animal rights.
My concern was that illogical hysteria often overshadows argument and that newspapers, ever seeking sensationalism, don’t present the full public view. Half of the hundreds of votes on this site were people saying the matter is overblown. The side point is not whether they are wrong or right but that the media isn’t presenting a journalistic view on topics such as this.
I used an overall view of animal rights (not just circuses) to make a point e.g. a dog or cat lover is rarely going to be found fighting for the rights of pigs (even though the latter are often more intelligent than their pet). There is culturalism at play.
Lazy ‘activism’ (those that would only shout on a blog instead of committing to a life creed with resultant action) is useless. I believe that people should do their best to live their beliefs and not be armchair critics… especially those that are over-emotional because that dilutes their argument (i am not referring to you – i’m responding fully because i respect your comment and so want to clarify my approach).
I’m also surprised that KAWS never contacted me regards this as i’ve proven willing to support your efforts.
Well Mike
Why are you raising the fact that KAWS never contacted you here. Surely that is inappropriate. It is great that you have this blog going but keep to the subject!!
You’re looking for a dispute where there isn’t any. I’ve supported KAWS before and will continue to do so if kept informed. It’s a positive. And i appreciate the position that Elaine has.
Circus the healthiest cleanest entertainment never had to be censored ok if you ban the circus what is next birds in cages horse racing pets football & cricket the leather ball comes from animals all in the council should not drink tea as it is taking a tiger habitat away in india will all at the council stop wearing leather Robert Perry our family have ran circuses in Australia for over 100 years & visited your beautiful country in july last year dont ban the circus
Who are you fooling Mike? You know who are the evil ones here!!!
Wicked Mike, Your ‘argument’ is totally illogical and you constantly conflate facts with your personal opinions. Just one of many rather outrageous examples: “The law of nature is that, cruel or not, the most vicious/successful animal wins. We are that animal.” Clearly you are not schooled in any philosophical arguments or world views other than an extremely narrow Hobbesian view – I suggest you read more widely. And your argument that thousands of people (sorry, HUNDREDS of thousands!) will purportedly lose their jobs overnight because we may stop eating animals. And we should be aghast at this real possibility, and make sure we continue eating animals to prevent such a disaster. Firstly, that will never happen at the drop of a hat, it will decrease slowly in time, mark my words. Secondly, this is somewhat off the topic of enslaving WILD animals in a circus, for no other reason than making money for the circus owners and providing an hour of entertainment for feckless crowds. Your little foray into this hot topic was not very successful.
I don’t work in the circus but do have an interest in circuses and also in animals. I wonder how many people leaving comments on here have actually been to the McLaren Circus for themselves and seen the animals, their living and exercise facilities and what they do in the ring before commenting. I personally have yet to see the McLaren Circus so cannot comment on their animals or their animal facilities. However, the animal circuses I have seen in various countries have included well cared for, fit and healthy animals, who have big large living conditions and throughout the day, have access to plenty of exercise, in order to keep them stimulated. Stimulation for animals in the true wild (what’s left of it) and in zoos in fairness is very limited. Like any sensible person I don’t want to see animals being kept in confined conditions and badly treated and that comment applies to domestic pets, farm animals, riding stables, the zoo, safari park and the circus. If the circus is breaking local animal welfare laws, then you have the right to complain and you could do something about it. If the circus is breaking no laws and fully complies with all local/national animal welfare regulations, then really do you have the right to object just because you don’t like animals in circuses. A large percentage of people do, they have the right to watch such entertainment if they wish and if you are against the idea of animals performing, then you also have the right not to buy a ticket. Nobody will complain if you don’t buy a ticket, so why should you complain if someone else does. I personally have no issue with performing animals, providing the training is done by positive reinforcement (ie reward and praise based training) and the routines the animals ‘perform’ is based on animals natural abilities and natural movements, their living and exercise facilities comply with all animal regulations. To those people who say they don’t go to the circus because its cruel, I just hope you are not jumping on the animal rights bandwagon. To have an opinion you have to be informed and to be informed you have to have first hand knowledge of what you are talking about.